5 unintended consequences of the Federal Reserve rate cuts

Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Today we face the ironic situation of the US government abandoning free market principles to save the free market.

Whether or not the Government will succeed remains to be seen. But in the mean time, there are some fascinating unintended consequences going on (fascinating in a morbid sort of way).

It seems like every generation learns the hard way that central planning does not work, and indeed often worsens the situation that it claims to cure.

So here are just a few examples of how the current US government actions often worsen the situation that they are trying to solve:

1. Lowering interest rates reduces credit to companies

People who invest their money in CDs and money markets are (sometimes unknowingly) lending this money to companies who need the money and are willing to pay interest for short-term loans.

By driving interest rates so low, the Federal Reserve risks a perverse side effect - many money markets will have an expense ratio that’s higher than their interest rate! This means that many money market investors will have a negative return on investment. If this causes investors to withdraw from the money market (and invest into, say treasuries), it lessens the amount of money available for companies to borrow. This is already happening, as evidenced by the huge demand for treasuries (even at near-zero interest rates).

If the government wants more money to be available for lending to companies, it needs to increase interest that people earn on savings. This will provide incentives for people to save, which causes more money to flow into money markets and CDs, and hence increases the pool of money to be lent to companies! Right now the very opposite is happening.

2. Lower interest rates reduces lending to individual borrowers

If you are a bank, here is an easy way for you to get almost free money with virtually no risk:

1. Borrow nearly unlimited amounts of short-term money from the Fed (at the 0.5% “discount rate”)
2. Buy longer term treasuries with this money (earn >2%)
3. Hold to maturity if necessary
4. Repeat

Note that the above does not include having to lend to flaky retail borrowers! So this rate cut actually has an unintended consequence of making retail borrowers even less attractive to banks!

3. Helping defaulting homeowners encourages more to default

If the government provides relief to homeowners who are behind on their payments, it creates incentives for even more homeowners to fall behind, so that they too can get lower interest rates and hopefully even principal reductions!

Surely not what is intended.

4. Guaranteeing deposits causes money to leave good banks

By providing strong guarantees to money deposited in unhealthy banks, it creates an incentive for people to withdraw their funds  from otherwise healthy (but not government-backed) institutions into bad banks that are guaranteed by the government!

5. Lesson learned by bankers - take even bigger risks next time

This is probably the worst of the unintended consequences. An entire generation (and probably more) of bankers and traders have now learned - that if you take risks, make sure you take huge ones. So that if you fail, you are more likely to be bailed out in the long run. The moral hazard being created by this bailout is just staggering.

The financial, mortgage, insurance and auto bailouts almost guarantee that the next bubble will be even bigger and even more disastrous when it bursts.